Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:24:11 +0000 From: Oliver <urnenfel@tiscali.es> To: freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org Subject: Re: remote name Message-ID: <20050811192411.10082.2@@vodafone.es> In-Reply-To: <bb4a86c7050811094476ac9f0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <42FB7A53.1060405@savvis.net> <bb4a86c7050811094476ac9f0a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> hmm... very strange. sorry, but i can only tell you this: if your > bluetooth device acknowledge the command (with command status event) > then you should look at the status field in the event. yeah the same i though > the command can be either accepted (status field in the command status > event is zero) or reject (non-zero status field). in either case, from > bluetooth stack point of view, things are working as expected, i.e. > communication between the host and the device is not broken, command > gets acknowledged, etc. yeah the status field in the comand status was 0, all as expected and actually I can be sure that in some way it is well coded, ase ONCE i got the remote name of my palm testing device, so I thought it was in some special conditions... or something that i am not initing > is your bluetooth device based on broadcom chip too? I think so, all looks quite generic BTW: I am sorry as this(and the previous mail) is not FreeBSD related, as I am coding the BT stack for ZETA operating system(before known as BeOS) therefore this problem/question i am having is related my implementation and not FreeBSD(the aim of this list i guess). My apologies for inconvenience. ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050811192411.10082.2>