Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 14:01:21 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [rfc] breaking out if_ath into ... lots of modules Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokr%2BSfcUm3KmYz3z=HXFeAtaFAU98Mr_B_LheXHTZ%2B7-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1901874.v6m8jKq4cl@ralph.baldwin.cx> References: <CAJ-Vmo=cQqdu%2B3k2fLWubhY3U7wzd85-samp56whovUrGEG2yQ@mail.gmail.com> <1901874.v6m8jKq4cl@ralph.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 May 2017 at 13:17, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Why not have if_ath.ko just be a wrapper module that depends on everything > like dtraceall.ko? That would let 'kldload if_ath' and the auto-loading > code in ifconfig still DTRT. You could name the "only the driver" module > ath.ko or some such. Oh yeah, I could also do that to reduce POLA. :) Ok, I'll add that to the TODO list before I submit a review. I'll rename if_ath to if_ath_drv or something. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokr%2BSfcUm3KmYz3z=HXFeAtaFAU98Mr_B_LheXHTZ%2B7-Q>