Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 19:50:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189257] [NEW PORT] databases/percona56-xtradb-cluster Message-ID: <bug-189257-13-kNJH5dcSld@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-189257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-189257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189257 --- Comment #12 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to daniel from comment #11) > I'm fed up with trying to get this port through, the original phar is > already staged and works fine in poudriere. How can I believe that without seeing an actual testport log. More than 50% of the submitted ports fail when subjected to it. > If you dont want it in ports then just feel free to close this ticket, I cba > to care anymore as waiting 3 months for a reply stating something that the > port already is compatible with is just sad. I won't hesitate to do this. As the only person walking through 1650 PRs that I know of trying to get bugzilla into shape, I jump at the chance to close a ticket. I won't lose a second of sleep. I had nothing to do with previous absence of replies. Your call: you prove log or you tell me to close PR definitely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-189257-13-kNJH5dcSld>