Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 15:38:57 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>, lwhsu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade Message-ID: <20090401113857.GO1964@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <op.urotvvn79aq2h7@localhost> References: <3cb459ed0903270809s2da0fce7i66686a176d369931@mail.gmail.com> <20090331230246.GN1964@hades.panopticon> <op.urotvvn79aq2h7@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeremy Messenger (mezz7@cox.net) wrote: > No need bsd.boost.mk over that small stuff. How about resolve conflict for > real by split boost and boost-python by have boost only install non-python > stuff and boost-python install only python stuff? That of course would be harder and more interesting, maybe I gotta dig into it. > The USE_BOOST isn't > going to solve anything either because the boost-check-python still stop > and tell it's conflict. Yes, but it's more verbose and it condenses hacks and checks in a single place. Also, if we solve the problem above and make boost-python only install python stuff, it will be easier to change logic in a single place. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090401113857.GO1964>