Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:06:40 -0800 From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X11 required for Document Project? Message-ID: <200203140206.g2E26e055256@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org> References: <20020314014952.45C7C3E3C@bazooka.trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote: > > The full list of packages needed by docproj (minus jadetex and its > > dependencies) is in /usr/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports. > ^^^^ > I think you mean "should be in". For example, python isn't listed. I thought I wrote that but apparently I didn't. python *shouldn't* be there BTW. There's nothing in FDP or the Web site that uses it. We probably want to build docproj (during releases) using WITHOUT_PYTHON. Sigh, one more Makefile knob that may or may not need to be tweaked. I'm starting to like ue's idea of docproj-lite, coupled with some better documentation and a trimming down of some of the old DTDs (for both docproj and docproj-lite). > This file is a good idea, but it gets out of date despite our best > efforts. This tells me two things...first, I must be the only person who builds releases with documentation and no ports, and second, it's been awhile since I've built a release. :-) It didn't help that this was a stealth dependency that snuck in with another update to the libxml2 port, no mention whatsoever in the commit log. :-( Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203140206.g2E26e055256>