Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 02:53:24 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@dsuper.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf system with mutexes Message-ID: <39BB5A14.167EB0E7@elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009100156050.306-100000@jehovah.technokratis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bosko Milekic wrote: > > For those interested, > > http://www.technokratis.com/code/mbuf/mbuf_mtx.patch Assuming we have a "my processor" index somewhere, how much work would it take to give each processor a separate cache of mbufs? Also, I've often wondered if the 'custer' special code might more simply be implemented by puting pointers to cluster methods in the mbuf external method pointers and removing all the special case tests to see if it's a cluster. In that case there would be just 2 cases: non-external and external, where 'cluster mbufs' are only a presupplied external type. -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000 ---> X_.---._/ presently in: Perth v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39BB5A14.167EB0E7>