Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:58:44 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To:        Andrew McNaughton <andrew@squiz.co.nz>
Cc:        "Michael C. Vergallen" <mvergall@mail.double-barrel.be>, Eddie Irvine <eirvine@tpgi.com.au>, Keith Woodman <keith@lightningweb.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Confusion 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9903211657540.10346-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
In-Reply-To: <199903211506.DAA21908@aniwa.sky>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Andrew McNaughton wrote:

> > That is what cvs was invented for .. and that I why I switched all my
> > machines to FreeBSD when 2.2.6. was released. However I don't just run 
> > cvs on all those machines I have a dedicated box that cvs's all the code 
> > and then builds all the code and runs a number off test scripts that test
> > all the code used in the production boxes and then sends me a report if
> > it fails if not I upgrade the production box by mounting it's hd and do a
> > automtic install then I log in to the production box check if any changes
> > are required in /etc and reboot the server. My  maximum downtime is 5
> > minutes per upgrade unless some hardware goes bad but that is not the
> > fault of FreeBSD.  
> 
> I wonder if this is generic enough that the script should be part of the 
> distribution.
> 
> Should FreeBSD be distributing scripts for maintaining build systems, testing 
> those build systems, and upgrading production systems from them?

  Already done.  "make buildworld" on your build system, and "make
installworld" everywhere else.

> Andrew McNaughton

Tom



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9903211657540.10346-100000>