Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:18:29 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 225305] net/nss-pam-ldapd: krb5_ccname option in nslcd.conf has no effect
Message-ID:  <bug-225305-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225305

            Bug ID: 225305
           Summary: net/nss-pam-ldapd: krb5_ccname option in nslcd.conf
                    has no effect
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: zi@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: cullum@c0ffee.net
          Assignee: zi@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(zi@FreeBSD.org)

Created attachment 189892
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D189892&action=
=3Dedit
patch to allow linking against different kerberos implementations

The krb5_ccname option in nslcd.conf for kerberos authentication has no eff=
ect.

This port always links against the base kerberos (heimdal). In addition to =
the
upstream documentation saying that only MIT kerberos is tested
(https://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/HACKING), when linking against heim=
dal,
the krb5_ccname option appears to have no effect. According to the debug lo=
gs,
/tmp/krb5cc_928 is always used as the ticket cache. Exporting the KRB5CCNAME
environment variable also did not work.

This issue was resolved when I linked against MIT's kerberos. I've attached=
 a
diff of the port's Makefile to allow choosing which Kerberos implementation=
 to
link against. I have only tested this with MIT kerberos.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225305-13>