Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 20:54:15 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Bruce Simpson <bms@fastmail.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r268943 - in head: include lib/libc/stdlib Message-ID: <A0B37C93-4E00-48BB-BEEB-D6A6B6F5B9E4@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <6A2B0200-EB23-459B-8E3F-6B1151C90D0E@freebsd.org> References: <201407211522.s6LFMnQo084633@svn.freebsd.org> <53CD430F.5040604@fastmail.net> <68E8EDB9-64DE-4037-9047-C8BEAD86801A@freebsd.org> <65378493-7F05-4314-9809-E689891F6067@gmail.com> <6A2B0200-EB23-459B-8E3F-6B1151C90D0E@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_89DBBDC5-E4C8-4CE1-9A39-D98AE8BE62ED Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Aug 3, 2014, at 9:39 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > Il giorno 03/ago/2014, alle ore 09:27, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> ha = scritto: >=20 >>=20 >> On Jul 21, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Il giorno 21/lug/2014, alle ore 11:42, Bruce Simpson = <bms@fastmail.net> ha scritto: >>>=20 >>>> On 21/07/2014 16:22, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: >>>>> ] >>>>> Log: >>>>> Add re-entrant versions of the hash functions based on the GNU = api. >>>>>=20 >>>> What, if anything, can be done about qsort_r() API incompatibility? >>>=20 >>> qsort_r is non-standard and we did it first, plus we will want to = stay compatible with Apple :). >>>=20 >>> I guess we could do some ugly parameter swapping in the case where = _GNU_SOURCE >>> is defined, but I won=92t volunteer to do that. >>=20 >> Are there any ABI considerations for the change? >>=20 >=20 > I would keep the qsort_r() ABI unchanged and add a GNU-compatible = version that is used only when _GNU_SOURCE (but not _BSD_SOURCE) is = defined. >=20 > This would already be pretty messy by itself because some portable = code may define _GNU_SOURCE but still may try to use the Apple/BSD = interface under another #ifdef. Perhaps it=92s just better to leave our = headers alone and let the end-users do the wrapping. If there=92s no ABI change, then I don=92t care what we do about a = non-standard API. However, once we=92ve made an API public, standard or = do, we have to support that ABI essentially forever when libc is = involved. Warner --Apple-Mail=_89DBBDC5-E4C8-4CE1-9A39-D98AE8BE62ED Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJT3vXXAAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEAFWEP/3K8hwDJ+65zbTP+hz5C/qD0 FsSKOAZvocc29uzsRvq31uKw91+KMPRTBzwXmsBkdT7Z32XZ5YlpF5IA3DOXXfUf E3dbqd+lqXzvIqUZmWUvPaBWqhd5Jxb2un4qt5ZZDaYTTbttGPPYLuIyevn/vbk7 0Y8f18z8dO6jLbvGdjg11uDrKojYaQQXIqsK6XIKmVHX5lcJDNx0htrZ4QAo2hUc H3JM5Q7G3sJucN01OJrQZzlC/RC2RDh5ZQP2HbYvFWBxkFRWz0cD8XOIPjE9zS16 s448xczGUFJIKWdcN3pUFyIx3mXhbHp4bhBg0rr4VG8QWlwqTUBsOTA4RLALLB81 PjQhxHwFkeTyNXI6KuO8WOyCtsuai71JqrTTYivSXfPrKl3RwfqRewBw03qk4bmN AoZFrwMPtRF9ef8ropxo+BWamcfWd7QaBiJvJe31CgtKSX0YVTfg2nmDOgtnzaq1 lkv8Ctr/UhcDqeI7aPdBCRelasT75vNQkJ7Grx1iQ/rDpiudm/F870Qo4cXrVL2/ wQ/xvGjCWsU5+xMVG/IQVpSSsDvH24o5LEpU26nV7BEukKAGqGIa2eWsY/K5vvGt NGQ8qQsrAuyqX8rD7JxjM0SNHXWbZWI2S7EHQ/IVeFiHvg9JQ2PWYC+WmPV/v9BI +JRPvYfJPUym3QVXcxrr =CNMc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_89DBBDC5-E4C8-4CE1-9A39-D98AE8BE62ED--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A0B37C93-4E00-48BB-BEEB-D6A6B6F5B9E4>