Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:13:16 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Franz Klammer" <klammer@webonaut.com> Cc: pav@freebsd.org Subject: Re: please test gdesklets-0.30 on 4.x Message-ID: <opscuace179aq2h7@mezz> In-Reply-To: <4120E780.6020102@webonaut.com> References: <4120A1A5.2060002@webonaut.com> <1092664929.476.36.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120C7A5.2010504@webonaut.com> <1092667534.476.41.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120CD37.4040603@webonaut.com> <1092670330.476.69.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4120E780.6020102@webonaut.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:57:36 +0200, Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> wrote: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> >> calendar >> >> can't load sensor Calendar. >> > > found a solution/workaround: > Calendar try to import a module that doesn't exist any more in 0.30. > > attached a patch (hi! mezz ;-)). Thanks for create a patch! I shall commit it when 0.30 goes in the ports tree. Umm, a question, why do you remove the -O and *.pyo? > think we should not remove gdesklets-0.26 from ports tree instead > it should be still there a gdesklets-old or something like that. > i'm sure there are more desklets who cause problems after the update. Ack, it will creating more problems than it is solving so I agree with pav. :-) If some desklets are out of date and never get update, then those should be mark as BROKE or remove until it's fixed by add patch(es) or update by author(s). Only small part that I don't agree with pav is: 'So patching desklets to be compatible with both versions - yes' I rather to change this sentence to 'So patching desklets to be compatible with 0.30 or remove them - yes'. Cheers, Mezz > franz. -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opscuace179aq2h7>