Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Mar 1999 23:01:14 -0800
From:      Ludwig Pummer <ludwigp@bigfoot.com>
To:        Leo Kliger <leo@astea.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: where's BASH
Message-ID:  <4.1.19990314225658.00ab12a0@mail-r>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.10.9903142141530.3879-100000@berkeleycs.ml.org>
References:  <199903150551.QAA05272@astea.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:43 PM 3/14/99 , Spam Me Here wrote:
>It isn't installed by default, go to /usr/ports/shells/bash2, 
>and ( as root ) type
>
>make ; make install ; make clean

I've found that with any kind of command line involving multiple makes
which depend on the previous, && is preferable to ;, so the line would be

make && make install && make clean

This way, if make or make install fail, make won't clean up its progress so
far. Could you imagine what would happen if you did a make clean following
every hiccup of installing the KDE port? Or (speaking from personal
experience) you were building your first 3.1-S kernel where you had
previously made 2.2.8 kernels... the make depend fails... the 2.2.8 kernel
(left over from earlier) gets installed... the next reboot brings a nasty
surprise. Moral of story: use && instead of ;

--Ludwig Pummer ( ludwigp@bigfoot.com ) ICQ UIN: 692441


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990314225658.00ab12a0>