Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:02:18 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does this require a manpage date bump? Message-ID: <20041023230218.GB771@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20041023210548.GA48606@gothmog.gr> References: <20041023210548.GA48606@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.10.24 00:05:48 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Does a minor change like the following require a manpage date bump? > > %%% > --- du.1.orig 2 Jul 2004 22:22:23 -0000 1.28 > +++ du.1 23 Oct 2004 21:02:35 -0000 > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ > .It Fl h > "Human-readable" output. > Use unit suffixes: Byte, Kilobyte, Megabyte, > -Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte > +Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte. > .It Fl r > Generate messages about directories that cannot be read, files > that cannot be opened, and so on. > %%% No, according to Ruslan it should only be done if there is actual content change. Of course it comes down to a judgment call, but in this case I think you can safely skip the bump. If not, Ruslan will probably tell you post-commit :-). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBeuL6h9pcDSc1mlERAjMPAJ0T3RvqKFHAu+ncrvlcE2gnKtf/+gCgkFNZ xwoLrxt5aeAdoC9w3TWTm5M= =0RgT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041023230218.GB771>