Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:47:42 -0800 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>, "Balaji G" <balajig81@gmail.com> Cc: qingli@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ECMP for FreeBSD 7.2 Phase 1 Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737B3@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737AF@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com><6dd1343e1002110021t544c09c9uec170c3671e364bb@mail.gmail.com> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737B1@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The ECMP (indirect) routes are installed into the FIB just fine, and=20 load balancing works fine with these routes. The problem is with interface prefix routes. See my other email for = details.=20 Because only a single prefix route was installed, obviously there is no=20 load balancing. -- Qing > > I would also like to know whether the Load balancing aspect works = perfectly > in FreeBSD 8.0 ?. Though i understand that the ECMP routes get = installed > fine in the FIB but would like to know whether the load balancing of = traffic > works in FreeBSD 8.0. =20 > > Thanks for your time > > Awaiting your reply . > > Cheers, > - Balaji >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A43046737B3>