Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:13:55 +0200 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended Message-ID: <ed891b50-c9e9-fa3f-0c0b-4d7ac2967417@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <201607131449.u6DEnbsJ065787@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201607131449.u6DEnbsJ065787@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/13/16 16:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > With: > uname -a > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \ > #1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \ > jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 > > cd /usr/ports; svn up > Updating '.': > At revision 418418 > > make fetch > pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected. \ > Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended > > This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false > assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious > from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile, > not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide > an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to > recompile whatever to get rid of warning. > > What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it, > It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ? > In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major > > What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ? > It' the "pkg-static" binary installed by the ports-mgmt/pkg port. It's invoked in various ways by the ports framework. You can ignore such warnings, they will go away once you forcibly update the pkg port. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ed891b50-c9e9-fa3f-0c0b-4d7ac2967417>