Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 14:51:18 +0200 From: "Peter Looyenga" <pl@catslair.org> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Would software "for non-commercial use" be acceptable as a port? Message-ID: <000201ce8b91$274e3a40$75eaaec0$@catslair.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4CwiYn50JosU%2BKzbCdzwKEdf6ro%2B-7hyG4h=6-qSF4zg@mail.gmail.com> References: <001001ce8b29$63546b80$29fd4280$@catslair.org> <CAOjFWZ4CwiYn50JosU%2BKzbCdzwKEdf6ro%2B-7hyG4h=6-qSF4zg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is how DansGuardian works, and it's a part of the ports tree = (www/dansguardian). The install points > the user to the licensing page on the web. It's up to the user to = decide if they're eligible for the non-com > license. Thanks a lot for that example, that's a very helpful example indeed. = Wasn't even aware of this one so far. And apologies for misaddressing my response in the first place, thus = making it end up in your private mailbox instead of the list. Kind regards, Peter -- .\\ S/MIME public key: http://www.catslair.org/pubkey.crt +- My semi-private Root CA: http://ssl.losoco.nl/losoco.crt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000201ce8b91$274e3a40$75eaaec0$>