Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:47:51 -0500 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, all-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, legacy-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT access.ports Message-ID: <20030208024751.GA42535@turquoise> In-Reply-To: <20030207211024.37BAF2A8B4@canning.wemm.org> References: <200302071823.h17INlaX014720@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030207211024.37BAF2A8B4@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:10:24PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: [...] > > How will you keep current with ports developments? (Things like structure, > > procedures and so on?) > > .. and ports tree freezes. Which should, if memory serves, be sent to developers@, not cvs-ports@. Previous policy (often not followed) from asami was that all ports infrastructure changes were to be reviewed by ports@. AFAIK, port-mgr@ still feigns to follow this. That said, it does seem like bad karma to not even browse the subject lines of each commit message. -- If I could think of a two-line witty aphorism for you to remember me by, this would definitely be it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030208024751.GA42535>