Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:22:11 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r484357 - head/mail/spamassassin
Message-ID:  <20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x@ivaldir.net>
In-Reply-To: <ca100d9e-c455-27c3-5605-2ecbb3c5a4bb@freebsd.org>
References:  <201811062146.wA6LknN3005274@repo.freebsd.org> <20181107083105.55o52urafcgdthec@ivaldir.net> <20181107091004.xbvzfyviyrkcbi2m@icepick.vmeta.jp> <ca100d9e-c455-27c3-5605-2ecbb3c5a4bb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--efxgitdyvqu5bc4d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 11/7/18 10:10 AM, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > Is there still a need for the japanese spamassassin? if yes, can't th=
e specific
> > > patch be incorporated in the regular one?
> > >=20
> > > That would simplify the life of many people to have only one spamassa=
ssin
> > >=20
> > > Bapt
> >=20
> > AFAIK yes. Additional patch improves spam detection accuracy on emails =
written
> > in Japanese but using mail/spamassassin's accuracy is not too bad.
> >=20
> > Regarding the current japanese/spamassassin port, I think it is depreca=
ted. It
> > is created for the old version of spamassassin and not updated for year=
s.
> >=20
> > I can found another Japanese tokenizer patch for the latest
> > spamassassin. The port should be renewed based on this:
> >=20
> > https://github.com/heartbeatsjp/spamassassin_ja
> >=20
>=20
> Hi!
> japanese/spamassassin is up for grabs.  If you are interested in maintain=
ing
> it and in updating it with that patch, I can help a little. I don't have
> time to maintain it myself.
> Regards

Can't those patches be available in the files directory on the
mail/spamassassins so we have one single port to maintain?

Best regards,
Bapt

--efxgitdyvqu5bc4d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Ib/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--efxgitdyvqu5bc4d--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20181107092211.dgcvichyunbss35x>