Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:33:50 -0500
From:      jacks@sage-american.com
To:        xphilius@yahoo.com, Ronnie Clark <Ronj_clark@yahoo.com>, kstewart@owt.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Best upgrade path from 4.1 Release to 4.4 Release, via CVsup if  possible 
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.20011022093350.00f12f38@mail.sage-american.com>
In-Reply-To: <20011022140536.88219.qmail@web11807.mail.yahoo.com>
References:  <3BD1815F.1DA92089@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
When doing an update/upgrade, be sure to read the "UPDATING" file for
changes hat can apply separately to the system or the kernel. The kernel is
affected largely from treatment of the hardware config which may have
worked before, but not now without some tweaking at the behest of the
UPDATING file....

At 07:05 AM 10.22.2001 -0700, X Philius wrote:
>Ronnie,
>I'm not sure if that would fix the problem or not. The error I was getting
was during the make
>buildworld stage, compiling /gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld. The specific Stop
error I was getting had
>something to do with an undefined reference to 'basename'. I naver got to
the point of making my
>custom kernel. On Kent's suggestion I tried the process with 4.2 Release,
and 4 Stable, instead of
>4.4 Release, and the buildworld process went smoothly. Course, now I have
to decide whether to be
>cautious and install 4.4 Release, or start tracking Stable. I think I will
probably chicken out
>and use sysinstall to upgrade to 4.4 Release on my real server. Odd that
you did not run into the
>same Stops running make buildworld though, I wonder if there is something
else going on with my
>system.
>
>Jason
>
>PS- Don' t know if you caught it above, but the buildworld went fine
upgrading to 4 Stable, so
>your hint about the bootstrapping having changed since 4.4 Release seems
correct. I'll be
>completeing the upgrade tonight on my dev server. I'll probably be posting
some questions about
>going with 4 Stable versus 4.4 release. My instinct tells me that "Stable"
is probably least
>stable immediately after a major release. I'd think the developers would
make lots of changes
>right after a release.
>
>--- Ronnie Clark <Ronj_clark@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Guys, I have been seeing your postings, but for some reason, I cannot
>> respond with my other mail account.
>> 
>> Any way, I just upgraded my 4.1 Release box last week. So I will see if
>> I can help.
>> First, at what step are you getting the errors? The reason I ask is that
>> the way I had to do it was to cvsup, then immediately clean out
>> /usr/obj, then do make world. Where my problem occurred was in the
>> KERCONF step. My resoloution was to revert back to the GENERIC kernel.
>> 
>> I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please let me know.
>> 
>> R Clark
>> 
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature name=smime.p7s
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
>http://personals.yahoo.com
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
>

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Server Admin

Sage-American
http://www.sage-american.com
jacks@sage-american.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20011022093350.00f12f38>