Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:19:23 -0600 From: "Victor R. Cardona" <vcardona@home.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Considering FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010303181923.A7927@marx.marvic.chum> In-Reply-To: <001001c0a40f$3f091b40$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>; from tedm@toybox.placo.com on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:24:55AM -0800 References: <20010303142158.A16878@linux.rainbow> <001001c0a40f$3f091b40$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:24:55AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Nonsense! I've run Solaris on Intel for a while and it supports
> plenty of hardware, although less "desktop" hardware than "server"
> hardware. But, I don't see that it's any more stable than FreeBSD
> and the lack of source is a detriment compared to FreeBSD.
Isn't Solaris x86 somewhat unstable? I heard that it had some serious
memory problems.
- v
--
Victor R. Cardona
vcardona@home.com
"Behold the keyboard of Kahless, the greatest Klingon
code warrior that ever lived!"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010303181923.A7927>