Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:33:11 -0600 From: "Stephen Hurd" <deuce@lordlegacy.org> To: "Paul Robinson" <paul@akita.co.uk>, "Stephen Hurd" <deuce@lordlegacy.org> Cc: <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, "Technical Information" <tech_info@threespace.com>, "FreeBSD Chat" <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Helping victims of terror Message-ID: <NFBBJPHLGLNJEEECOCHAGEFICEAA.deuce@lordlegacy.org> In-Reply-To: <20010922121807.C55559@jake.akitanet.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Jury of their peers... sorry to slap that one in there, I > actually HAVE been > > seeing similar statements, but are they any more likely to come to a fair, > > impartial decision as a jusy chosen from a country that has been > screming for > > his blood for the last few years? > > An agrument used by various Nazi war criminals over the years. In that case, > the only people who would qualify to be judge and jury would be the Swiss > who historically are on everybody's side at the same time whilst maintaining > they aren't on anybody's side. The US really wouldn't like a country where > all motor sport is illegal and every male adult is a member of the army > (sounds almost Taliban-ish), to take over the running of this though. :-) Actually, I didn't have a very good reason for responding to that bit. I really have no solution to what would be a fair and impartial court. In all honesty, the crime was commited in the states, so it should be tried in the states under US laws. Or by the UN under international law. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NFBBJPHLGLNJEEECOCHAGEFICEAA.deuce>