Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:59:34 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Scott Kamp <scottk@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 92056 for review Message-ID: <200602201359.35492.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200602191929.k1JJTN06063193@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200602191929.k1JJTN06063193@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 19 February 2006 14:29, Scott Kamp wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=92056 > > Change 92056 by scottk@pavilion on 2006/02/19 19:22:23 > > Migrate from sebsd to sebsd2 to start new branch to bring current > Integrate vendor branch //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/... to > /depot/projects/trustedbsd/sebsd2 to bring SeBSD up to date and current > with FreeBSD CURRENT Submitted by: scottk@freebsd.org FYI, all the other TrustedBSD branches use 'trustedbsd_' as a prefix of their branch name: trustedbsd_acl trustedbsd_acl_nfsv4 trustedbsd_audit trustedbsd_audit2 trustedbsd_audit3 trustedbsd_audit3_old trustedbsd_audit3_openbsm_sys trustedbsd_cap trustedbsd_doc trustedbsd_dsep trustedbsd_mac trustedbsd_objlabel trustedbsd_openbsm_audit3 trustedbsd_sebsd trustedbsd_sedarwin If you were following that pattern you would use 'trustedbsd_sebsd2' rather than just 'sebsd2'. Also, all the other TrustedBSD branches are branched from the 'trustedbsd' base branch in //depot/projects/trustedbsd/base/... For example, the audit3 branch's view is: View: //depot/projects/trustedbsd/base/... //depot/projects/trustedbsd/audit3/... Wherease the sebsd2 branch's view is: View: //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/... //depot/projects/trustedbsd/sebsd2/... Is the inconsistency intentional? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602201359.35492.jhb>