Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:44:24 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        powerpc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243180] security/afl: fix build on powerpc64 elfv2
Message-ID:  <bug-243180-25139-2ixWxNo4eb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-243180-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-243180-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243180

Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #210521|                            |maintainer-approval-
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> ---
Comment on attachment 210521
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D210521
patch

I'd rather you hook things up like in afl++ for aarch64 and powerpc64,
i.e., stop installing useless programs on non-x86 and making LLVM
option mandatory.  I personally do not see the point though.  We
already have security/afl++ for powerpc64 and aarch64, afl is stuck
on LLVM 8, and afl++ is more active than afl.

Why does afl need -mabi=3Delfv2 but afl++ does not?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243180-25139-2ixWxNo4eb>