Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:58:51 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> To: Aloha Guy <alohaguy123@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD box as router adding latency Message-ID: <20040227115628.W32442@duey.wolves.k12.mo.us> In-Reply-To: <20040227063625.54127.qmail@web41312.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040227063625.54127.qmail@web41312.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote: > Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried > setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is > there a larger number that actually works well? You can try higher HZ numbers, but you might run into other problems. Experiment and see. Others have experimented with higher HZ numbers so you might want to check the list archives. Anyway, is a 1ms delay really that bad? -- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040227115628.W32442>