Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Sep 2017 02:36:56 +0200
From:      Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net>
Cc:        Russell Haley <russ.haley@gmail.com>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ARM board recommendations with true GigE ports
Message-ID:  <4E771B56-D588-468E-AB60-35DB4DB31318@netgate.com>
In-Reply-To: <201709230004.SAA22590@mail.lariat.net>
References:  <201709222206.QAA21968@mail.lariat.net> <07D27DD7-2434-4A2E-91CE-A05D12BBAC2A@netgate.com> <CABx9NuQf1iE0_Y=vX0fC_o61t0-iku1vYmTAcFWSCEqsnw0H8w@mail.gmail.com> <201709230004.SAA22590@mail.lariat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:03 AM, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> wrote:
>=20
> At 05:47 PM 9/22/2017, you wrote:
>=20
>> We make a custom product based on the Armada 38xx and it was measured
>> at high 900 Mbps using a Buildroot Linux. I want to say 980 but the
>> engineer who did the measurements is away so I can't confirm.
>=20
> So, if this is a recommended SoC for network-related applications, what co=
mmercial boards that use it are recommended? And is there driver support for=
 them in FreeBSD?

Armada 38x support landed in the tree a couple months back.=20

Solid-run makes one. Two, actually.=20

We make one.=20

Apparently russ.haley@gmail.com is employed by a company that makes one, tho=
ugh from his description it=E2=80=99s might be an Armada 37x0, and there isn=
=E2=80=99t any support in the tree for this SoC.=20

>=20
> --Brett Glass
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E771B56-D588-468E-AB60-35DB4DB31318>