Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 04:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@nagual.pp.ru, peter@spinner.dialix.com.au Cc: max@wide.ad.jp, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/filesMakefile Makefile.SSL md5 md5.SSL ports/www/apache/patchespatch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-agpatch-ah ports/www/apache/patches.SSL patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ... Message-ID: <199707271102.EAA00850@blimp.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970726214554.28766A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> (message from =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Sat, 26 Jul 1997 21:48:02 %2B0400 (MSD))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > Has repository copy been performed? Otherwise we lose the history of * > the port!! You are absolutely right. * I don't think that history needed. If you disagree, ask peter to restore * Attic files to apache-stable + few changes after splitting. It's amazing you still haven't gotten the clue after all these years, Andrey. :) Peter, what should we do? For apache-stable, I think we just need to resurrect apache and update (downdate?) it to the latest stable version. As far apache-current...I don't know. Is it safe to repository copy apache right over it? It should be, if the versions of all files are newer, right? Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707271102.EAA00850>