Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:36:03 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Christer Solskogen <solskogen@carebears.mine.nu> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading from gnome 2.2 to 2.4 Message-ID: <1063982163.14992.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <3293.148.121.98.136.1063972247.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> References: <3293.148.121.98.136.1063972247.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:50, Christer Solskogen wrote: > I`m a bit confused. > The topic on #freebsd-gnome on freenode says: > "Use portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=3Dyes ORBit2 ; portupgrade -R -m BATCH=3Dye= s > gnome2 to upgrade from GNOME 2.2 to 2.4." >=20 > freshports(and this list) says > "portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=3Dyes atk - portupgrade -R -m BATCH=3Dyes gnome= 2" >=20 > Should the portupgrade on 'atk' or 'ORBit2' be used?(or both?) The ORBit2 version is more correct. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/axRTb2iPiv4Uz4cRAp+oAJ9s8n8wvHolLis9ji7RK9tyLC9L1gCfX4kD /lctu7TDIOCSkKQ337Sbc+A= =oXe/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1063982163.14992.2.camel>