Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:09:49 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: "Scott Hess" <scott@avantgo.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Performance issue with rfork() and single socketpairs versus multiple socketpairs. Message-ID: <20000125070949.752381C03@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> of "Tue, 25 Jan 2000 01:24:09 GMT." <200001250124.BAA36765@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Somers wrote: > > "Scott Hess" wrote: > > > > > I've found an odd performance issue that I cannot explain. I'm using > > > socketpairs to communicate with multiple rfork(RFPROC) processes. > > > > Use 'pipe(2)' rahter than 'socketpair(2)' as both are bidirectional and > > pipe is a LOT faster. > > Although pipe(2)'s bi-directional capabilities are not standard (I've > been stung by this in the past :-() Neither is rfork()... Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000125070949.752381C03>