Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 08:49:56 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Kevin Sanders <newroswell@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Vishal Patil <bsd.devil@gmail.com>, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tools for FreeBSD development Message-ID: <20061203064956.GB2405@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <375baf50612022005i6b9a174w5d251e710d8cefc@mail.gmail.com> References: <eb7c8e2e0612021224x13598151ya58e471c9dfaa3b4@mail.gmail.com> <eb7c8e2e0612021528h47239e5cl3cf0c1e08e399329@mail.gmail.com> <20061202210741.02e0728a@kan.dnsalias.net> <375baf50612022005i6b9a174w5d251e710d8cefc@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders <newroswell@gmail.com> wrote: >On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: >> I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less >> configuration is the best option out there. [...] > > Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you > referring to booting from a network image/server? That's an > interesting idea. I'm fairly new to FreeBSD development also, > and prefer the speed of a dedicated box, but recently suffered > my first corrupted beyond repair system. Yes, a "diskless" boot is a network-based boot :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061203064956.GB2405>