Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 12:10:10 -0800 (PST) From: William Woods <freebsd@cybcon.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net> Subject: Re: FW: DSL natd rules.... Message-ID: <XFMail.000130121010.freebsd@cybcon.com> In-Reply-To: <200001301834.LAA13968@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The original configuration worked well, and I don't think you would > notice any problems using the double-NAT configuration whatsoever, > although you could simply hook all your boxs directly to the Cisco and > use it that way instead, which may be easier for you. > > The NAT implementation on the cisco seemed to work quite well... I would but I want the FreeBSD box to be a firewall for the LAN > > Nate ---------------------------------- E-Mail: William Woods <freebsd@cybcon.com> Date: 30-Jan-00 Time: 12:08:51 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000130121010.freebsd>