Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:08:33 -0500 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: budsz <budiyt@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make fetchindex failure Message-ID: <20070704000833.GA20506@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <4d4dc3640707030919q5966b568r8a51b06ef29f9c7d@mail.gmail.com> References: <4d4dc3640707021628p7dc9e2aan1e9d145cadb7407c@mail.gmail.com> <4689F9DA.6010302@FreeBSD.org> <4d4dc3640707030654n8a64f9aj8ed3f882fe11391a@mail.gmail.com> <468A5F08.2080907@FreeBSD.org> <4d4dc3640707030919q5966b568r8a51b06ef29f9c7d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 11:19:04PM +0700, budsz wrote: > So the best way I should upgrade my system to FreeBSD 6.X series?, Yes, that is what we have been recommending for some time now. > BTW which one: > > "tag=RELEASE_4_EOL" or "tag=RELEASE_4" ?, I've already read in > handbook and didn't find exactly "tag=RELEASE_4_EOL" :-( There was a README posted to ports@ about how to do this. OTOH if you have already upgraded your ports past the RELEASE_4_EOL point, then your best choice is to just go ahead and upgrade to 6.2. Otherwise, you are going to have to revert your ports tree and then deal with the fallout of having any ports you have upgraded since the RELEASE_4_EOL tag was laid down, and that would be a complete waste of time. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070704000833.GA20506>