Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:12:01 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: fandino@ng.fadesa.es Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance Message-ID: <15374.1098699121@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:09:14 %2B0200." <417CD0CA.8010708@ng.fadesa.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <417CD0CA.8010708@ng.fadesa.es>, fandino writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <417CC2F9.1050900@ng.fadesa.es>, fandino writes: >> >> >>>Robert, I'm trying to understand where GEOM fits in the FreeBSD I/O structure >>>and I only had found the original McKusick figure: >> >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs contains a number of slidesets and papers >> relevant to GEOM. > >ok, I see it. Then it's impossible bypass GEOM to test character access >to disks. yes. >However I would like to know disk performance of list members using a >VIA 82C686B chipset. Anyone in the list is using this chipset? Just a check: You _have_ disabled all the debugging right ? WITNESS and all that stuff ? (See top of src/UPDATING) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15374.1098699121>