Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-contrib@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include port_after.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980611083941.29233A-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199806110546.NAA10222@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
wouldn't it be best to take the libbind part of libc, separate it out into a separate directory, and use contrib to fill that directory that way we could easily keep up with the original.. (I believe for example that libbind has some re-entrancy fixes) (rumour only) julian On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Peter Wemm wrote: > John Birrell wrote: > > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > peter 1998/06/10 22:09:54 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include port_after.h > > > Log: > > > Merge conflicting changes (all 1 line! :-) from 8.1.2. > > > > What is happening with the duplication of symbols between libc and > > libbind that prevents a static link? This broke every program on alpha > > that links against libbind. > > It's going to be fixed properly.. Libbind will either go away entirely, > or will only supplement functionality in libc rather than duplicate libc > functionality. I plan on doing this over the next few hours, if all goes > well. > > > -- > > John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ > > CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 > > > > Cheers, > -Peter > -- > Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Netplex Consulting > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980611083941.29233A-100000>