Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:57:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Bogdan TARU <bgd@icomag.de> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 'rm' incompatibility with Posix.2 Message-ID: <20020410164921.U82564-100000@fw.cgn.icom> In-Reply-To: <xzpadsbwr6p.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
UUps... :) Sorry, OpenBSD and NetBSD (typing fast & wrong, that's what I'm good at). Could you also try the NetBDS's 'rm'? If it does work like FreeBDS, than I really don't know what to believe anymore. bogdan On 10 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bogdan TARU <bgd@icomag.de> writes: > > On 10 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in this > > > respect, and *BSD is correct. > > Except for OpenBDS. No NetBDS machine available, maybe some of you could > > try it on one as well? > > I don't know of any "OpenBDS" or "NetBDS", but NetBSD has the same > semantics as FreeBSD: > > des@rc4 ~% mkdir foo > des@rc4 ~% touch foo/bar > des@rc4 ~% ln -s foo baz > des@rc4 ~% ls -l baz > lrwxr-xr-x 1 des des 3 Apr 10 16:41 baz@ -> foo > des@rc4 ~% ls -l baz/ > total 0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 des des 0 Apr 10 16:41 bar > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020410164921.U82564-100000>