Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:30:19 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4 Message-ID: <15866244@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060519110817.GU93253@droso.net> (Erwin Lansing's message of "Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 %2B0200") References: <200605190910.k4J9AthA057344@freefall.freebsd.org> <24823738@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519102325.GF1116@k7.mavetju> <58748084@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060519110250.GB1103@k7.mavetju> <20060519110817.GU93253@droso.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 May 2006 13:08:17 +0200 Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:02:50PM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in > > my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild@. In the mean time > > (and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know > > how to assign this PR back to himself :-) > > > Repocopies are special. There is no real concept of a maintainer as > after the repocopy, in principle, it's a new port and could have another > maintainer as the old one. Also, when the PR is assigned to portmgr, > portmgr will need a committer to sign the PR back to after the repocopy > is done. > I'd say, if the PR originator is a committer, just sign it right over to Maybe to assign it to originator, who'll assign it to portmgr? > portmgr. If not, assign to the maintainer and/or wait for a committer to > pick it up. Agreed. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15866244>