Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Oct 2001 22:02:33 +0300 (EEST)
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG, <kevin.way@overtone.org>
Subject:   Re: New rc.d init script roadmap
Message-ID:  <20011018215427.F8102-100000@hades>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110180933040.30874-100000@smtp.gnf.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> There is one main issue to resolve before I go through and rewrite the
> rc.d scripts. Do we want to keep the existing FreeBSD scripts as much as
> possible? or do we want them to look like NetBSD's? I prefer the former
> myself. I think Kevin's implementation has gone more for the latter.

Keeping the functionality as close as possible to what we now have is
probably a nice idea.  This way people that haven't worked with NetBSD
a lot (including myself) can help in testing this, too.

I'm sure that there are arguments supporting the second option, one of
them being that it will make future changes easier to integrate in one
of the BSD's reusing the same code. I would go for the second option,
exactly because of this.

The first option makes things nicer during the testing period, but
testing is not going to last forever and having more compatibility
among the BSD's in the future is something I seem to like more.

-giorgos


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011018215427.F8102-100000>