Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:27:59 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rarpd Makefile rarpd.8 rarpd.c Message-ID: <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:36:54AM %2B0200 References: <200106180648.f5I6mXw73601@freefall.freebsd.org> <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:36:54AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 23:48:33 MST, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Reviewed by: dd, silence on -audit > > I'm seeing a lot of these, and they make me nervous. The -audit list > should not preclude -hackers from having a chance to review code. The > -audit list is for security reviews. -audit has turned into the defacto code review mailing list, though it was originalliy intended only for security audits. Is it really necessary to send patches to two mailing lists? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010618092759.C9834>