Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 23:51:01 +0200 From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sdl11-config / sdl-config Message-ID: <20030812215101.GH92209@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20030812214420.GA49666@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030811202331.GC92209@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20030812034508.GA903@k7.mavetju> <20030812042553.GA45612@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030812114430.GK815@k7.mavetju> <20030812213307.GG92209@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20030812214420.GA49666@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:33:07PM +0200, Hans Lambermont wrote:
> > Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > See also ports/55494: [patch] ports/Mk/bsd.sdl.mk
> >
> > That won't help me. I'm not talking about one of the ports, but of more
> > generic software. For SDL in Blender we use things like :
> >
> > sdl-config --prefix
> > sdl-config --libs
> > sdl-config --cflags
> >
> > for all target platforms (around 10), except this doesn't work on
> > FreeBSD because of the version number in the name ... hence my symlink
> > proposal; it leaves sdl11-config as is for all ports to use, and still
> > offers non-ports software a reasonable default. If both sdl11 and say
> > sdl12 were installed I don't even care to which one it would point, if I
> > did I would be using sdl11-config. Ok, enough. what do you think now ?
>
> As I already said, patch the port to use ${SDL_CONFIG} instead of a
> hard-coded binary name.
Did you read what I wrote ? I am not talking about a port, so
${SDL_CONFIG} won't work for me. SDL made sdl-config and I think that
should be available for non-port software.
kind regards,
Hans
--
http://lambermont.webhop.org/ () ascii ribbon campaign - against HTML mail,
/\ vCards and proprietary formats
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030812215101.GH92209>