Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:32:23 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: DougB@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xscreensaver Message-ID: <oprzod39gi8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1070573010.28210.1.camel@blue.mcneil.com> References: <1070573010.28210.1.camel@blue.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:23:30 -0800, Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can we remove the --without-pam from xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gnome > now? It cripples systems using LDAP. Does they build with pam support/enable by default? If yes, then I disagree for to remove the --without-pam. I only will support to add the WITH_PAM define, but by default the pam should be disable. Cheers, Mezz > Thanks, > Sean -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oprzod39gi8ckrg5>