Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 May 2015 08:54:11 -0400
From:      Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com>
To:        Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl?
Message-ID:  <55534973.60701@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP352B3E925C70377888AE2880D90@phx.gbl>
References:  <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com> <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com> <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> <20150512022857.7230c163@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55515251.5040503@rawbw.com> <20150512112505.5f36f0b2@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <5551DB5A.7090508@rawbw.com> <20150513012435.1912fdc2@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <BLU436-SMTP104BFED1CE268833F4D24E080D90@phx.gbl> <55533883.8010900@gmail.com> <BLU436-SMTP352B3E925C70377888AE2880D90@phx.gbl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Carmel NY wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015 07:41:55 -0400, Ernie Luzar stated:
>
>   
>> I am having the same problem. Many things missing from the base openssl 
>> that are in the port openssl.
>> Installing the port version only complicates things by not knowing which 
>> directory structure is really in play.
>> My suggestion is just have the base OS source contain everything the 
>> openssl port installs.
>>     
>
> Basically, that is what I stated. Simply have the "base" version mirror the
> "port's" version. Another, perhaps even simpler method would be to have the
> "port's" version [overwrite|replace] the base system if a user decides to
> install the port's version. A new user could be given the option of
> installing the older "base" system or the newer "port's" version when first
> installing FreeBSD.
>
> This problem is NOT unsolvable; however, for whatever reason, it doesn't seem
> to be getting any traction either. It sort of reminds me of a problem with the
> "slapd" rc file that has never been ratified.
>
>   
Maybe it takes a PR to shine light on this problem as the subject of 
this post is no longer valid




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55534973.60701>