Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:51:49 -0600 From: Craig Boston <craig@tobuj.gank.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, imp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Weird PCI interrupt delivery problem Message-ID: <20051202015149.GB15424@nowhere> In-Reply-To: <20051202013146.GA15424@nowhere> References: <20051130020734.GA6577@nowhere> <200511301035.14284.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051130172303.GA57453@nowhere> <200512011342.19417.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051202013146.GA15424@nowhere>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 07:31:46PM -0600, Craig Boston wrote: > If I'm reading the code correctly, it appears that we call _PIC and set > the interrupt model to APIC, *if an MADT table exists*, regardless if > we're actually using the I/O APIC or not. This is what initially had me > thinking ACPI/PIC wasn't supported at all. No, scratch that, the enumerator never gets called unless a local apic device attaches. The code is correct. Bizarre, I wonder why the tunable to override LNK[A-H] wasn't working before. Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051202015149.GB15424>