Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 09:34:18 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>, "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d/zfs and /etc/rc.d/zvol no longer in FreeBSD-runtime package? Message-ID: <20160530063418.GB34407@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20160529221945.GE80759@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAOc73CA==ZWEG_nXrUViV2N4JQV84kQY6%2B9Ssv=bGqiE3i9NsA@mail.gmail.com> <20160527210001.GI4025@FreeBSD.org> <CAOc73CAsbWhR0YnMXfJ=x_3LaTwYANTTYfpt9NDrMD=LoGNGKw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOc73CBNYzGThvj5gvdG%2Bx%2BqnYyR3ttP7y5Cy5NQ7yUcnDaAJw@mail.gmail.com> <20160529175701.GA80759@FreeBSD.org> <CAOc73CDGO9ZUa9-J8Xu7UEEfoV_Qqbor5RXumqwiEPxDjpBprQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160529221945.GE80759@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:19:45PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:13:58AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote: > > Actually, this was a different issue, but I have worked out the problem. It > > relates to r299840. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=299840 > > > > I didn't notice this change, thank you for tracking it down. > > > Basically, r299840 introduced a new FreeBSD-zfs package, which I did not > > have installed. So when I did a pkg upgrade, it upgraded FreeBSD-runtime > > and removed this files which were now split off into the new FreeBSD-zfs > > package. Obviously, since I did not have the new FreeBSD-zfs package > > previously installed, the files were not installed under this new package. > > > > The fix is simple: pkg install FreeBSD-zfs > > > > Yeah, but until you realize what new package is needed, it is a bit > non-intuitive. (This is one of the main reasons we're considering > packaged base "beta" for 11.0-RELEASE.) > > > However, it does raise the point that whenever a new base pkg is created, > > how should users be informed? Should pkg provide a warning that some files > > have been moved to a newer package that isnt being installed, or should it > > be a note in UPDATING? > > > > This is a good question. > > I'm not sure what the answer here is, to be honest. But you raise > a very good, and very serious concern. > > What I think we should do is something along the lines of the MOVED file > in the ports tree. But doing this on a per-file level does not quite > scale very well. My fear here is ending up with something that > resembles OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc. May be adding new feature to pkg? spliting and mergering packages and track history of this in repo base? > In the meantime, would you mind adding this particular issue (not the > FreeBSD-zfs package, but the underlying problem) to the PkgBase wiki > page? > > Glen >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160530063418.GB34407>