Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:16:09 -0600 From: "Richard Seaman, Jr." <dick@tar.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisitted.. Threads goals.? Message-ID: <19991130071609.J29767@tar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911292207120.7902-100000@current1.whistle.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911201834440.6767-100000@current1.whistle.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911292207120.7902-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:45:28PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > --------------------------- > COMMENTS: > > Peter made a valid point which is that maybe we should figure out > a waypoint between here and there, that gives us a working but > sub-optimal threads package of the order of the linux threads package, > that can be included in 4.0 > > We may have 2 whole months to get that done :-( [snip] > how would we move towards Peter's hope? and are there things we can do > that there is no argument about? I think that separating the proc > structure is agreed, but it is not needed for Linux threads.. I've attached a private email I sent to Jason Evans last week related to this subject:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991130071609.J29767>