Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:55:55 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Mark <admin@asarian-host.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* Message-ID: <20040321065555.GE2097@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net> References: <1079841282.664.10.camel@osaka> <20040321040035.GC2097@dan.emsphone.com> <200403210638.I2L6CT0D027199@asarian-host.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Mar 21), Mark said: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Nelson" <dnelson@allantgroup.com> > To: "Rilindo Foster" <webmaster@monzell.com> > Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 5:01 AM > Subject: Re: Do I really need to rebuilding *everything* > > > > > Question is, can I get away with rebuilding my entire > > > ports collection? With about 300 apps complied, I really don't > > > want to do it. ;_; > > > > You only need to rebuild the ports that use the openssl libs and > > link statically. My guess is that would be zero. > > What do you mean? I built OpenSSL into everything; sendmail, Apache, > qpopper, stunnel, php4, mod_perl, etc. Close to the 300 of the original > poster. :) And like him, I really feel rather upset if I'd have to do it all > over again. Or are all of the above dynamically linked? The file command will indicate whether a program was linked static or dynamic. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040321065555.GE2097>