Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:14:25 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "shivak" <shivak@shivakaul.com>, "freebsd-questions" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: NFS and SFS - alternatives? Message-ID: <000d01c093ae$d3d02500$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <001401c09394$205a3700$0200a8c0@taco>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think you really ought to take a look at NFS closely before writing it off. The most current NFS versions have solved most of those problems. Is there something _specific_ in the NFS protocol your concerned with? Ted Mittelstaedt tedm@toybox.placo.com Author of: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide Book website: http://www.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of shivak > Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2001 11:03 AM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: NFS and SFS - alternatives? > > > Soon, I will be implementing a network where network-exported > filesystems are a crucial component of functionality. Naturally, I > looked to NFS as a solution, but I have heard of many people having > problems with it (i'm basically worried about performance and security). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000d01c093ae$d3d02500$1401a8c0>