Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:19:09 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> Cc: vbox@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/182468: [patch] lang/gcc builds unrunnable emulators/virtualbox-ose Message-ID: <5277668D.9010206@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131103140012.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201311031010.rA3AA1UI094428@freefall.freebsd.org> <20131103140012.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
03.11.2013 16:00, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:10:01AM +0000, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> The following reply was made to PR ports/182468; it has been noted by GNATS. >> >> From: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> >> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> >> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org >> Subject: Re: ports/182468: [patch] lang/gcc builds unrunnable >> emulators/virtualbox-ose >> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 21:09:07 +1100 >> >> --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Content-Disposition: inline >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> >> On 2013-Nov-01 15:19:32 +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> wrote: >> >Isn't it easier to map libstdc++.so.6 to gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 in=20 >> >/etc/libmap.conf? >> > The libstdc++.so ABI is supposed to be backward-compatible, so, in theory, > libstdc++ from gcc 4.6 should be a drop-in replacement for the libstdc++ > from our base. I'll second this. When i tried this for the first time I expected a weird outcome with heavy breakage but alas everything was working as before. Nothing failed in base or in ports. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5277668D.9010206>