Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      16 Feb 2002 09:44:23 -0800
From:      "James A. Peltier" <james@site-fx.net>
To:        GB <gregbrooks@blue-mouse.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BIND vs djbdns
Message-ID:  <1013881463.2872.1.camel@agent-orange.site-fx.net>
In-Reply-To: <000d01c1b69e$dd38a6d0$0201a8c0@CITYMOUSE>
References:  <000d01c1b69e$dd38a6d0$0201a8c0@CITYMOUSE>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
BIND is included in most UNIX operating systems.  BIND is even the base
for the Windows 2000 Nameserver.  Best to learn BIND as you will find it
implemented more than djbdns.  That said though I am personally
migrating my DNS over to djbdns.

On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 20:03, GB wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Not to start a flame war, but does anyone have opinions/advice on BIND9
> vs. djbdns?
> 
> The former is the worldwide standard; the latter seems simpler and more
> secure. Simpler appeals to me, since I'm still scratching my head after
> reading several BIND HOWTOs.
> 
> Any thoughts appreciated!
> 
> Greg B.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
-- 

-James

Hardware, n.:
  The parts of a computer system that can be kicked.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1013881463.2872.1.camel>