Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:08:03 -0600
From:      Zhihao Yuan <zy@miator.net>
To:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Zhihao Yuan <zy@miator.net>, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Adding Python 2.7 to linux-c7
Message-ID:  <CAGsORuBA-WcQBnFAqAs8kwSGSnTiUb60D8aY5GvxEoox0D=80Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171111171247.5ed81813@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
References:  <CAGsORuAS=CKXxkzXfamdJ9h8h=15X1R%2BvS7dmRwaKPQGJhgWbQ@mail.gmail.com> <20171111171247.5ed81813@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org> wrote:

> > The motivation is that some Python software ship Linux-
> > specific binaries, and we want to enable the uses.
>
> Can you give an example of such software, because adding python and
> its modules is a big decision.
>

This is the one our research team is
working on:

  https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sciunit2

It doesn't work in linuxulator yet, but
our further contribution may make it
work.  I could try to ship on

  https://conda.io/docs/index.html

but still, pypi is a much easier platform
to approach for the users.

Since Python added manylinux1 abi
support to wheels, I suspect that it
may be popular to ship Linux-specific
binaries -- unless we propose a
freebsd abi to PEP?

And I don't think this is a *big* decision...
All we need are just Python modules
with Linux binaries, we are not asking
for packaging everything starting from
setuptools!

-- 
Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.
_______________________________________________



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGsORuBA-WcQBnFAqAs8kwSGSnTiUb60D8aY5GvxEoox0D=80Q>