Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:29:23 +0100
From:      Christian Walther <cptsalek@gmail.com>
To:        Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removing all ZFS support from boot process
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikMkZH44mLpREgmGzoZyz9wjDpN-GFJ-mjv3H0F@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102111025470.23895@rust.salford.ac.uk>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102101447240.69722@rust.salford.ac.uk> <C2BE4608-A0A6-493D-A767-37F91ECED4AE@gsoft.com.au> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1102111025470.23895@rust.salford.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On 11 February 2011 11:33, Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[...]
> =A0I suspected BIOS, that's why I was going to get a new motherboard. I'v=
e
> always had problems getting gptzfsboot working on this hardware and there
> are no more BIOS updates now. That's why I have ufs root, as it only work=
ed
> intermitantly.

> =A0Then I wondered what the hell was going on in the loader that took >60=
s and
> seemingly touched every drive. I assumed it was FBSD that was tasting all
> the drives.
> =A0Cheers.

AFAIK if you have gptzfsboot on your drives it will probe the
partitions on your drives, which can take a while. So if you suspect
ZFS it might really be an option to replace gptzfsboot with gptboot.
I recently changed the configuration of my home server from 1x80GiB
SATA HDD (booting & /-pool) and 4x400GiB PATA HDD for zraid-Pool on
geli to 2x2TiB SATA HDD with gmirrored /boot and the rest for a geli
encrypted zmirror (including /). For me it feels as if it takes a few
seconds longer for the loader to appear. The latter uses GPT and
labels where possible.

HTH
Christian



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikMkZH44mLpREgmGzoZyz9wjDpN-GFJ-mjv3H0F>