Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:13:32 +0100
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: rewinding a disk drive takes too long 
Message-ID:  <77605.1074377612@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:11:01 GMT." <E1Ahyej-0000OI-5l@psg.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <E1Ahyej-0000OI-5l@psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>>>> How active was the file system that was being read by (r)dump?
>>> not at all.  it was a laptop with nothing active on it
>>> except for the dump.
>> OK; fair enough -- but I couldn't tell from your note, and "active file
>> system" has been a plausible culprit in most such cases I've seen so
>> far.
>>> it did have X and gnome up.  but it has 1gb ram, so should
>>> not have been swapping or anything.
>> :-)
>
>btw, what i forgot to say was
>  o source system is current as of yesterday
>  o dest system is stable as of today
>  o until the last upgrade to the stable dest, dump would never
>    complete!  it always got to the same point, 86%, and then hung

This is actually a pretty normal thing, dump is not very good at
predicting the size of a dump if the filesystem is live (and I
belive in a few other circumstances as well)

Largest number I've seen recently was -250% :-)


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77605.1074377612>