Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:32:30 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAL on FreeBSD 5.5 redux Message-ID: <1171006350.67014.26.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200702090758.18317.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200702090634.56455.lofi@freebsd.org> <1171000334.67014.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200702090758.18317.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 07:58 +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 9. February 2007 06:52, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > There was a recent change that went into HAL to favor atapicam > > installations over those without. I wonder if this could be causing > > problems. Please provide an lshal. >=20 > Oh, and I really should mention this, the atapicam devices work fine with= the=20 > current HAL, the problems are just with the atapicd devices (i.e. with=20 > atapicam turned off, that was the regression testing I did). Then what is this lshal from? It looks good (i.e. this problem should not occur). The cdrom->channel should be 1 based on this output. I need an lshal from a machine exhibiting this problem. Can you also add: fprintf(stderr, "Reading props from %s\n", parent); After line 85 in hfp-cdrom.c, and provide the resulting output. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFzCOOb2iPiv4Uz4cRAvZ9AKCvMcN1FLDwLuPyM2YdACGyGE2dZQCgggI7 g+WBiH33yHCzmWyGnE/ZdOQ= =8rhJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-f/yzFaTYH1G0IMUya1wx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1171006350.67014.26.camel>